ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 14376
Dec 27 13 7:19 AM
Registered Member
Five Years Later wrote:richard63 wrote:Actually as soon as Sue realized she was under the influence and defeated Malice the costume was changed. No retcon. It was an actual storyline and it made sense. That doesn't really answer the question I asked. Was it established from the time that the costume was introduced that it was a Malice manifestation, or did readers just find that out when Sue did? Readers did not know exactly what was going on when the costume appeared but either right at the time or just before/after there were hints that Sue wasn't herself. I'm pretty sure other characters were also questioning why Sue was wearing that. Reed was presumed dead at the time so the reader and the characters were misdirected into thinking that Sue was just angry about Reed's "death." At least that's how I remember it from two readings.
richard63 wrote:Actually as soon as Sue realized she was under the influence and defeated Malice the costume was changed. No retcon. It was an actual storyline and it made sense. That doesn't really answer the question I asked. Was it established from the time that the costume was introduced that it was a Malice manifestation, or did readers just find that out when Sue did?
Actually as soon as Sue realized she was under the influence and defeated Malice the costume was changed. No retcon. It was an actual storyline and it made sense.
Share This