ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 21247
Aug 10 13 10:24 AM
Registered Member
Fin Fang Foom wrote:I think it's due to the source material -- maybe a slightly underexposed photostat or dupe negaitive. You can see it in the way that the emphasized words (in bold italics) and other very fine detail tends to run together a bit and close up. It's subtle, but it's noticeable, particularly by comparison. If you were to compare it to an original printed page, even with the spread of the ink on newsprint, you'd probably see a difference.
Share This