profh0011 wrote:
It's just typical that when I post one of my best posts (and one told in an entertaining, and even funny, manner) that someone has to waste 3 whole paragraphs needlessly focusing on ONE small point, and trying to defend a man who is INDEFENSIBLE.





Stan clearly hired Jack Kirby so Jack could do his writing for him, which Stan then took BOTH CREDIT AND PAY for. Stan's a crook, and he learned from the best.


I find it odd that someone who helped maintain a Silver Age Marvel Comics Index site could despise Marvel so much.

It's also ironic that you complain about credit, when you've been signing your name to the work of others with your alleged "restorations".

Look for the HRK below the comics code symbol.

 "You know the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the facts. They alter the facts to fit the views. Which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering." --Doctor Who