It would be nice to understand the thinking of whoever decided not only to remove the cover logos, but also to remove the logo from issue 337, where it's an integral part of the atwork. Have they not read the books? This smacks of the kind of thinking that gave us the Miller Daredevil tipped covers. And how odd the covers must look now with essentially a quarter of the image being blank space? These covers were drawn to work with a logo taking up the top of the image. They weren't meant to look this way.

I'll be skipping this and sticking with my first three Simonson Visionaries volumes, mostly because I don't really need anything after Simonson stopped penciling and I have no desire to collect the tail end of the run (Visionaries volume three ends in a nice spot), but I must admit that this odd decision to lose all the cover logos makes my choice a lot easier.

It always leaves me shaking my head: why can't Marvel and DC just reprint stuff, straight up? Why do they always have to make these seemingly arbitrary changes?