Fin Fang Foom wrote:

I saw it in the store and I didn't like the the prominent wood pulp paper photographic background on every page. The Sunday Press Nemo books did this first, and better, because it was subtle.


That's either a difficult effect to pull off well, or it's largely a matter of taste (or some combination thereof). The second Starman Archive looked terrible, and the D&Q John Stanley books I've seen suffer for it, as well.

As to the missing material from the sequence, well, that was just a bewildering decision.
I'm sorry you didn't find the Stanley books to your liking Brian, I thought they turned out wonderful. But I love the entire design aesthetic. As for the Starman archive (2), I preferred it to the 1st one myself.

As for the Krazy Kat book...I perused it, but am happy waiting for a Fanta version as I already have the RAW book it appears in.



  

Visit my website at www.chancefiveash.com